Shared Minds Build Better Science
We Are Not Meant to Build Alone
From ancient tribes to modern teams, humans have always relied on community — for safety, for meaning, and for progress. No one survives alone. And no one builds alone either.
Science, too, is a social endeavor. Behind every breakthrough is a chain of minds — mentors, collaborators, reviewers, peers.
Yet somehow, in today’s world of independent consultants and freelancers, we’ve started to expect scientists to go it alone.
The Roots of Science Are Communal
From the first apprenticeship models to medieval guilds to modern universities, scientific knowledge has always passed from person to person.
Even now, academia thrives on:
- Mentorship (master–apprentice models in PhD programs)
- Peer review (anonymous critique before publication)
- Lab collaboration (shared credit and group discovery)
- Conferences (ongoing dialogue and exposure to new ideas)
And the data supports it:
- International co-authorship rose from 18% to 23% globally between 2010 and 2020.
- The average number of authors per paper continues to increase across all fields.
- European programs like Horizon 2020 mandate multi-partner collaboration.
- Most academic researchers attend multiple conferences during training — PhDs report 4–5 international events on average.
Science flourishes not through competition — but through connection.
Industry Has Structure, Too — But It's Different
In large companies, scientists still have some support:
- Cross-functional teams (hardware, firmware, application scientists, software)
- Project managers and leads
- Documentation systems and onboarding
- Internal meetings and post-mortems
But even here, the structure is goal-bound — it exists to ship product, not necessarily to nourish people.
There’s little room for wandering curiosity. Little time for reflection. And peer review becomes… a checkbox in a workflow.
Freelancers Are the Most Isolated of All
Now imagine the independent consultant. They’ve left the lab. They’re not part of a team. They don’t have a senior scientist to bounce ideas off. They don’t get feedback unless the client gives it (and often, the client isn’t a scientist at all). These individuals — freelance scientists, technical consultants — work in silence. And yet, they keep going. I admire their bravery, their grit, their dedication.
But we need to ask: Should they really have to do it all alone?
What’s Missing: A Community of Knowledge for Freelancers
What if we brought back the ecosystem?
- A place where scientists outside academia can share early ideas
- A place for peer review of proposals, protocols, even consulting strategies
- A space for virtual meetups, discussions, mini-consortiums, collaborations
- A way to say: 'You’re not alone. Your mind is part of something bigger.'
Because knowledge isn’t just data. It’s a conversation. And every scientist — even the independent ones — deserves a seat at the table.
Conclusion: The Community Is the Infrastructure
We don’t need to reinvent science. We just need to restore what worked: shared effort, open discussion, mutual critique.
If we want freelance scientists to thrive — not just survive — we must stop treating them like isolated vendors and start treating them like participants in a shared journey of discovery.
A freelancer platform shouldn’t just offer contracts. It should offer community.
Are you an independent scientist who believes in building together?
Let’s make it happen: https://theappliedscience.com
Do High-Impact Work in Science & Engineering
Join a growing network of researchers, engineers, and technical professionals tackling real-world innovation challenges
About Us
The Applied Science
Flexible R&D Support for MedTech and Instrumentation Companies